Dutch Elections 2025: PVV Leads, But Will Power Follow?
As the Netherlands approaches the general election on Wednesday 29 October, Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom (PVV) continues to lead national polling. However, translating electoral strength into executive authority remains uncertain. Despite PVV’s position as the likely largest party in the next parliament, most mainstream parties have signalled reluctance or outright refusal to enter coalition negotiations with Wilders. As a result, a PVV-led government remains improbable under current political conditions.
Coalition Prospects
Based on the most recent polls, a purely left-wing or right-wing bloc is unlikely to reach a viable governing majority. The most plausible outcome remains a broad centrist coalition, potentially incorporating a right-wing outlier to secure parliamentary support. Such a coalition would require compromises across core policy areas, including migration, fiscal governance, and climate commitments.
The Netherlands has a history of protracted coalition formation processes, and the forthcoming negotiations could extend for several months. A continuation of the current caretaker administration for an extended period remains a credible scenario.
Political Legitimacy and Voter Sentiment
The exclusion of the largest parliamentary party from government could have longer-term political consequences. Preventing PVV from entering office, despite topping the popular vote, risks reinforcing perceptions of institutional obstruction and elite gatekeeping. This dynamic may contribute to increased voter disillusionment, expanding the appeal of anti-establishment rhetoric in subsequent electoral cycles. Such developments would deepen existing polarisation and challenge perceptions of democratic responsiveness.
Governance Constraints in a Fragmented System
The Dutch political system remains institutionally robust, but the current level of party system fragmentation appears increasingly structural. Coalition politics - once episodic - has become the defining modality of governance.
A broad coalition composed of ideologically distant parties would face significant challenges sustaining policy coherence. Divergences across key issues - including migration regulation, emissions targets, and fiscal policy - raise the risk of veto politics, where individual coalition members obstruct or dilute proposals. This dynamic threatens to produce incrementalism, delayed legislative action, and fragile consensus-building that sacrifices strategic clarity.
Implications for Investors and Strategic Planning
Delays in coalition formation and fragmented executive leadership are likely to slow decision-making across fiscal frameworks, infrastructure planning, and regulatory initiatives. Industries reliant on state coordination, permitting, or subsidies should expect continued uncertainty well into 2026.
Strategic stakeholders should plan for extended policy ambiguity and adjust timelines for regulatory clarity, budget allocations, and programme approvals accordingly.
With a long-delayed caretaker government already in place, investors, policymakers, and strategic planners should brace for a continued environment of protracted negotiations and deferred clarity. While outright instability remains unlikely, the ability to govern decisively is increasingly constrained by coalition arithmetic and deepening political fragmentation.
Want the full briefing or scenario breakdown for your sector? Get in touch.